Click download or read online button to get democracy and authoritarianism in south asia book now. One simple way to categorize governments is to analyze the power of the people. Review of ayesha jalal, democracy and authoritarianism in. Jalal takes the three states of south asia, india, pakistan and bangladesh, which has common historical and colonial. Insights from the political elites role in consolidating indian democracy. Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic in nature, and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military in an influential 1964 work, the political. Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia by ayesha jalal pdf, jalal, ayesha. India and pakistan essential reading mitra, subrata k.
Academic analysis in social scientist, 2379, julyseptember 1995, pp. This site is like a library, use search box in the widget to get ebook that you want. The analysis shows how, despite differences in form, central political authority in each. Like regimes in many other developing and emerging economies, many african ruling parties display hybrid forms of governance, exhibiting the outer appearance of consolidated democracies in the. Jalal, a 1995, democracy and authoritarianism in south asia. But with the sudden death of jinnah and later liaqat. Knowledge accumulation in comparative historical research. This course is intended as a broad survey of the political, social, cultural, economic, institutional, and international factors that foster and obstruct the development and consolidation of democracy. Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia download.
Comparing democracy and authoritarianism no two governments, past or present, are exactly the same. Jan 10, 2017 democracy and authoritarianism in south asia. A comparative and historical perspective, chapter 1. International journal of politics, culture, and society, vol. Subnational authoritarianism in federal democracies. Jalal, democracy and authoritarianism in south asia. Political economy of development and change in south asia.
Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia a comparative and historical. In other regions of the world, authoritarianism and democracy are also regionwide phenomena rather than isolated events in separate countries. The leftpopulist authoritarianism that is taking hold across a swath of latin america bears many resemblances to the rightist populism that was once widespread in the region. Jun 19, 2004 jalal, a 1995, democracy and authoritarianism in south asia. Ayesha jalals democracy and authoritarianism in south asia.
A comparative and historical perspective, cambridge. Ayesha jalals democracy and authoritarianism in south. Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia download ebook. Apr 06, 1995 challenging the view that a shared colonial legacy led to contrasting patterns of political development in south asia democracy in india and authoritarianism in pakistan and bangladeshayesha jalal argues that, despite differences in form, central political authority in each state has confronted similar threats from ethnic and regional movements. Political field dynamics and the elites interest in democracy. Journal of political studies 4 smuts, and all the other heads of dominions of the. Pdf ayesha jalal democracy and authoritarianism in sbook zz. Ayesha jalal, democracy and authoritarianism in south asia, chapter 2. There are signs, however, that the leftist variant will be an even bigger problem for liberal democracy.
Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government. Our recent research explores this ambiguous space betwixt and between authoritarianism and democracy in two contexts, rwanda and south africa. Read download democracy and authoritarianism in south asia. Law, authoritarianism, and democracy in asia symposium. Democracy isnt receding in southeast asia, authoritarianism. Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia university of warwick.
Edited by james mahoney and dietrich rueschmeyer, 1174. We were reading about the end of history, the triumph of democracy, and the liberal world order. Democratic transitions in latin america political science. A comparative analysis of democracy in pakistan journal of indian studies 87 role of leadership at the birth of pakistan, muslim league assumed the sole power of leadership in pakistan. His research interests include constitutional law and human rights, with a special focus on criminal justice system and media law in china.
Slater and riley both adopt comparative historical analysis cha to get at these questions. Find all the books, read about the author, and more. What do we know about authoritarianism after ten years. A comparative and historical perspective contemporary south asia first edition, thus edition by. Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia by south asian. Articles, conference papers, and books about the growing phenomenon of postelection violence, both as an outcome of discontent and as a campaign technique, are becoming something of a new subliterature bridging the disciplines of conflict resolution and electoral studies, joining other more positive new thinking about democracy that has. In a comparative and historical study of the interplay between democratic politics and authoritarian states in south asia, ayesha jalal explains how a shared colonial legacy led to apparently contrasting patterns of political development democracy in india and authoritarianism in pakistan and bangladesh. Titled democracy and authoritarianism in south asia, the session started after the lunch break, approximately at 2.
Critical theory and the frankfurt school cuban political development cycles of protest democracy and authoritarianism in subsaharan africa democracy and dictatorship in central asia. That fourth program is closest to the elitist school on democracy, but instead of emphasizing the problem of. A comparative and historical perspective, cambridge university press, p4854 muslim leaguepakistan. Mahoney 2003 distinguishes three major research programs on democracy. South america had completed its journey to electoral democracy, the soviet empire had disintegrated in relative peace, and subsaharan africa was passing through an unprecedented series of multiparty elections. Authoritarianism is a form of government characterized by strong central power and limited political freedoms. But with the sudden death of jinnah and later liaqat ali khan. Comparing democracy and authoritarianism democracies. South asian states are unique in their state formations and have been conditioned by different historical and social cultural processes.
In comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Democracy and authoritarianism in subsaharan africa. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. A comparative and historical perspective contemporary south asia first edition, thus edition. It is critical of the comparative claims of jalal, democracy and authoritarianism in south asia. Covering east china, japan, korea and taiwan and southeast asia the 10 asean states, it is difficult to distinguish it geographically in any meaningful way from the borders of south asia, the south pacific, australia, russia or central asia. A comparative and historical perspective contemporary south asia by jalal, ayesha isbn. To put that story in a historical perspective, we can consult data from freedom house, whose freedom in the world rankings are comparative indicators of the. A comparative and historical perspective, cambridge university press, 1995. Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia by south. This research tradition has enjoyed something of a rebirth in comparative politics over the last decade. Jalal, ayesha, the colonial legacy in india and pakistan, in democracy and authoritarianism in south asia. Origins of authoritarianism how are authoritarian regimes constructed in the. Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia by ayesha jalal.
A comparative and historical perspective contemporary south asia 9789693506297. It has led to a weakening of institutions, including the media, which is harmful from the perspective of the countrys evolution as a true democracy. Democracy and military authoritarianism christophe jaffrelot, the pakistan paradox. Far from representing a neat and sharp dichotomy, democracy and authoritarianism are reflective of ongoing struggles between dominance and resistance. Challenging the view that a shared colonial legacy led to contrasting patterns of political development in south asia democracy in india and authoritarianism in pakistan and bangladeshayesha jalal argues that, despite differences in form, central political authority in each state has confronted similar threats from ethnic and regional movements. The real story of the state of democracy in southeast asia is not the threat of contemporary reversal it is the strength of durable authoritarianism in the nondemocracies. Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia by ayesha. In a comparative and historical study of the interplay between democratic politics and authoritarian states in postcolonial south asia, ayesha jalal explains how a common british colonial legacy led to apparently contrasting patterns of political development democracy in india and military authoritarianism in pakistan and bangladesh. Start by marking democracy and authoritarianism in south asia. A comparative and historical perspective as want to read. The first book in a new series, this work probes the consequences of colonialism.
1014 971 918 327 1606 1265 773 1181 1385 798 918 1406 151 595 1177 804 1569 872 587 190 824 663 468 832 1128 805 1417